« Bone of Contention | Main | And We LIKED It That Way »

April 29, 2012

Comments

Richard Prosch

Good thoughts, Steve. The ol' separation of art and artist --hard, personal decisions most folks don't even think about making. Reminds me of my struggle with the Lizard King after reading NO ONE HERE GETS OUT ALIVE by Jerry Hopkins. Struggled with Vonnegut too.

Pat Sandberg

I had no idea you were such a Vonnegut fan. He remains my favorite author, no matter the truth of his life. Ahh, the discussions we missed out on, you and I!

I had an Art History professor who insisted that you couldn't separate an artist's distasteful personal life from their artwork. As an admirer of talents such as Rodan, Picasso, and Frank Lloyd Wright, I humbly disagree. The art world (including literary) is littered with brilliant asshats. Clearly, acting like a douche-nozzle does not preclude you from making breathtaking art. Hell, one of my favorite artists, Alphonse Mucha, renowned for his gorgeous Art Deco illustrations of women, was apparently a notorious misogynist! I have to say, however, that my admiration was sorely tested after reading the personal details of Arthur Gill, the creator of the Gill Sans font and others. Now THERE'S a biopic waiting to be made!

The Pencilneck

I had a similar droopiness after reading about John D MacDonald. I hate hearing about insinuated lothario stuff, drunken loutishness, and condecending behaviour in fellas you'd assume usually stride around in red capes.

Someone made a crack about Wodehouse...I've gone through some of his bio stuff, and he seems more chumpy savant than boor. (Whew!)

Wow...I just realized that two of my biggest literary heroes were pipe smokers...

Do you 'avail yourself of The Briar', Steve? :)

Steve

I'm fortunate in that I was never a Doors fan, Rich. If I had been, watching Oliver Stone's Doors movie would've been excruciating. Or I should say *even more* excruciating. (Ever since, I've referred to a particular style of biopic as "two hours with an asshole." Pollock was another example. As you might guess, it's not my favorite kind of film.)

Oh, man, Pat -- two Vonnenuts working together and we never even knew it. So what are your faves? My top choices are pretty boring (Slaughterhouse-Five and Breakfast of Champions) but I recently reread God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater and Hocus Pocus and thought they were killer. Hocus Pocus, in particular, I'd underestimated back in the day. Oh, and Jailbird's fantastic! Right up there at the top. Sirens of Titan, Galapagos and Bluebeard kind of clump up in the middle for me. Good but not mind blowing. And Slapstick struck me as surprisingly thin when I read it again. Funny but slight. I'm guessing I'll have the same reaction to Timequake when I revisit it. Anyway, I could go on and on...and already have.

MacDonald gets a couple of mentions in the Vonnegut bio, T.P. Not for boozing and skirt-chasing, though. He was just connected to one of Vonnegut's important editors, Knox Burger. I'm afraid I've never smoked tobacco from a pipe, so I'm probably disqualified from being anyone's literary hero. Does it count if I blew bubbles with one?

Pat Sandberg

Steve- I'd have to go with Breakfast of Champions, first and foremost. It was my The Catcher In The Rye, with Kilgore Trout as my Holden Caulfield. After that would be God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater and Player Piano.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Bookmark and Share
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 01/2006